Legal Opinion

Crowell v. May

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 12, 1996No. 2940894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joe Crowell, the defendant, appeals from the trial court's order granting the plaintiff, Arlene May, a new trial in a negligence case after the jury had returned a verdict favoring Crowell.

The record reveals the following pertinent facts: Crowell and May were involved in an automobile accident in January 1993. Thereafter, May sued Crowell, alleging, among other things, that Crowell had negligently and/or wantonly allowed his vehicle to collide with hers, causing injuries and property damage. May demanded a jury trial and sought compensatory and punitive damages. Crowell denied the allegations…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Matter of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Miller v. MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  5. Boykin v. KeeblerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dunlop Tire Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte AtchleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  3. Ex Parte FowlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  5. Adams v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API