Legal Opinion

Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. Hiawatha Gas, Oil & Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 7, 1913No. 6949PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Fremont District Court. — Hon. Charles Cavender, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

The Hiawatha Oil Gas and Refining Company, as plaintiff, brought suit against The Florence Oil and Refining Company, as defendant, upon ten promissory notes. The trial of the cause to the court resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed.

As a defense to the action, the defendant pleaded, that although, according to the terms and conditions of the several notes, they were due at the time the action was commenced, that under an agreement, entered into with the plaintiff, the time for payment had been extended. This was denied by plaintiff. On the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smiley v. MeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Starnes v. SchofieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Harvey v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Publix Cab Co. v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. Taylor v. Continental Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Jones v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Alcoa Edgewater No. 1 Fed. Credit Union v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API