Legal Opinion

Stanton v. University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Dallas

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 17, 1998No. 05-98-00205-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

Walter Stanton, III, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his suit after it sustained appellee’s plea to the jurisdiction. In a single issue, he argues that because the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Dallas (Center) had actual notice of the injury he sustained, the notice requirement of the Texas Tort Claims Act was satisfied and the trial court should have exercised jurisdiction. We conclude that whether the Center had actual notice is immaterial to the trial court’s exercise of jurisdiction. We reverse the trial court’s order of dismissal and remand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Essenburg v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stroud v. VBFSB Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. Bowles v. Wade, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  4. Speer v. Stover, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. KreiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Crane County v. Saults, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  4. Fox v. Wardy, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
  5. William J. Hone & Falk & Fish, L.L.P. v. Hanafin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API