Legal Opinion
State v. Kreider
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 12, 2001No. 2-00-226-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this interlocutory appeal, we must determine an issue of first impression, namely whether minors suing the State of Texas are excused from compliance with the six-month presuit notice requirement of section 101.101 of the Texas Tort Claims Act. Tex. Crv. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 101.101 (Vernon 1997). We hold that they are not.
II. Factual Background
On December 28,1999, Appellee William Kreider, III (Kreider), individually and on behalf of his two minor daughters, Elizabeth and Kathryn Kreider, filed suit against the State of Texas in the 158th District…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Kerrville State Hospital v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Hines v. HashTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Essenburg v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- City of San Antonio v. Butler, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- City of Alton v. Sharyland Water Supply Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- City of Mexia v. Tooke, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
- Texana Community MHMR Center v. Silvas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.