Legal Opinion

State v. Bruckner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2014No. S-13-164Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 280 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS could be drawn as to whether Okoye knowingly provided false or misleading information in his autopsy report. Because the elements of a malicious prosecution action are difficult to prove, “a plaintiff has a steep climb in prosecuting a mali- cious prosecution action.”40 Nevertheless, appellees have not demonstrated as a matter of law that McKinney will not make that climb. We reverse the district court’s order granting appellees sum- mary judgment. R eversed. Heavican, C.J., and Stephan and Cassel, JJ., not participating. 40 McKinney v. Okoye,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BurlisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API