Legal Opinion

Stassun v. Chapin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1936No. Appeal, 198PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

In this suit to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident, one of plaintiff’s medical witnesses was a Dr. Fleming. Counsel for defendant having attacked his testimony, plaintiff’s counsel, in his closing address to the jury, made the statement that “Mr. Swaney wants to condemn Dr. Fleming so that we will get only a small verdict of Three or Four Thousand dollars.” Defendant moved for the withdrawal of a juror. The court refused the motion, but instructed the jury to “disregard the remark of counsel for plaintiff absolutely. Just dismiss this…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Celia Gumbs and James Gumbs v. Pueblo International, Inc. D/B/A Pueblo Supermarkets. Appeal of Pueblo International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. King v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. John Mileski, an Infant Over the Age of 14 Years, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Edward Francis Mileski v. The Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API