Legal Opinion

Oh v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1996No. A96A0706PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

George E. Bell brought an action against In Keuk Oh in superior court alleging malicious prosecution and breach of contract. Oh answered and moved for summary judgment on the basis that Bell failed to assert these claims as compulsory counterclaims in a prior magistrate court action brought by Oh against Bell in which Oh was granted a default judgment. We granted Oh’s application for an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment.

Oh contracted to provide shoe repair services for Bell, who operated a leather goods business. In 1994 a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Howe v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Leggett v. Gibson-Hart-Durden Funeral Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. BJ HOWARD CORPORATION v. Skinner, Wilson, Strickland, Hardy & BensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. v. PokalskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Bigley v. MosserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Perrett v. SumnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Horne v. Harbour Portfolio VI, LPDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  5. GEFFRY TATE v. MICHAEL HABIFCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API