Legal Opinion

Howe v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1989No. 46899PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunt, Justice.

We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Howe v. Roberts, 191 Ga. App. 143 (381 SE2d 117) (1989) to decide two questions: (1) whether the Civil Practice Act must or may be followed in a magistrate court, and (2) whether a counterclaim for abusive litigation under Yost v. Torok, 256 Ga. 92 (344 SE2d 414) (1986) can be sustained where the party against whom it is sought to be asserted has prevailed in magistrate court.

The facts, more fully set forth in the Court of Appeals opinion, are as follows. Howe filed a breach of warranty suit in magistrate court against Roberts,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yost v. TorokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Benning Construction Co. v. Lakeshore Plaza Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Howe v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Abushmais v. ErbySupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Colquitt v. Network Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Contract Harvesters v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Feinour v. Ricker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Long v. Greenwood Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API