Legal Opinion

Walker v. Goetz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1920No. 1043Published

Error from Midland County Court; J. M. De Armond, Judge. Action by Chas. E. Goetz against Mrs. John Walker. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

This is a companion case to the case of Mrs. John Walker v. C. E. Goetz, 218 S. W. 569, this day decided by this court. The pleadings of both parties, the evidence, and the proceedings had herein are practically the same as in the former case, except that in this case the husband did not join the wife in the execution of the promissory note, and, as required by articles 1840 and 1841, Vernon’s Sayles’ Civil Statutes, as to the husband, while joined in the suit with the wife, no judgment whs rendered against him.

The judgment is affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920