Legal Opinion

Walker v. Goetz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1920No. 1042PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Midland County Court; J. M. De Armond, Judge. Action by Charles E. Goetz against Mrs. John Walker and husband. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and the named defendant alone brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

Charles E. Goetz, defendant in error, brought this suit in the county court of Midland county against John Walker and wife, based upon a promissory note in the sum of $700, executed by John Walker and Mrs. John Walker in Arizona and made payable to the order of C. E. Goetz at Benson, Ariz., bearing interest and providing for the payment of attorney’s fees on default of payment when due. Defendants were duly cited and filed answer. Plaintiff caused a writ of attachment to be duly issued and levied upon certain real estate, the separate property of Mrs. John Walker, in Midland and Tarrant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. W. A. Ryan & Co. v. M., K. & T. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Merrielles v. State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Bramwell v. ConquestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Walker v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API