Legal Opinion

Lucas Bank v. King

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from, Franklin Circuit Court. — Hon. A. J. Seat, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHough, J.

It was provided by tbe Revised Statutes-of 1855, page 1122, section 65, that the judge of the court in which any suit for partition was brought, should allow a reasonable attorney’s fee in favor of the attorney bringing the suit, which should be taxed and collected as other-cost?. Under this statute it was held by this court, in Draper v. Draper, 29 Mo. 13, decided in 1859, that it must appear of record that the plaintiff in partition had agreed to pay the attorney a certain fee, in which event, the judge,, if he deemed the sum agreed upon reasonable, might allow the same, to be taxed as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skouten v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. GeigerSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. Jennings v. JenningsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Liles v. LilesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Connor Realty Co. v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Forsee v. McGuireMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API