Wilkey v. City of Pekin
Illinois Supreme Court
ERROR TO TAZEWELL. This cause was tried, before Harriott, Judge. The opinion of the court furnishes a statement of the case.
1Opinion of the CourtSkinner, J.
This was an action of .assumpsit. The cause was submitted to the court upon the following agreed statement of facts:
That the defendant is a corporation, duly incorporated as a city under the general law, entitled “An Act to Incorporate Towns and Cities,” approved February 10th, 1849, and acting as such under the act incorporating the cities of Quincy and Springfield; that the plaintiff is a resident of said city, and was a resident thereof at the time of the tax hereinafter stated.
That the plaintiff, at the time of the assessment of the tax, was part owner of the steamboat called the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Pacific Railroad v. Cass CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Board of Supervisors v. DavenportIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Redmond v. Commissioners of RutherfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- State ex rel. Rankin v. HarringtonMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- First National Bank v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.