Legal Opinion

Redmond v. Commissioners of Rutherford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1882PublishedCited by 25 opinions

MotioN for injunction to restrain defendants from collecting certain taxes, heard at Fall Term, 1881, of Rutherford superior court, before Avery, J. Motion allowed and defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtRuffin, J.

The plaintiffs are domiciled in the state of New York, but were owners of lands lying in several of the counties of this state, which had been sold by their agent, who keeps an office in the town of Rutherfordton in this state, and had power to sell and execute covenants for title and to collect the money. The covenants to pay the purchase money are solvent only because of the fact that the title to the lands is retained as a security.

These covenants for the purchase money amount to many thousands of dollars, and are all kept in the office of-said agent at Rutherfordton ; and the single…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Jefferson v. GardnerNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  2. City of New Albany v. MeekinIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Wilkey v. City of PekinIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. New Orleans v. StempelSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. In re the Estate of JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Armour Packing Co. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Hutchinson v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. State ex rel. Rankin v. HarringtonMontana Supreme Court · 1923

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API