Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Sutherland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 1995No. 9210-06861; CA A81244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This appeal and cross-appeal arise from a dispute over plaintiffs alleged nonpayment of a loan from defendant and the parties’ rights under a related option agreement. Plaintiff appeals and assigns error to: (1) the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for defendant on plaintiff’s usury claim; (2) the court’s failure to award plaintiff reasonable attorney fees as the prevailing party in an action to enforce the parties’ option agreement; and (3) the court’s failure to award plaintiff fees and expenses resulting from defendant’s failure to timely admit that the underlying transaction was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Loewen v. GalliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Webb v. CulverOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baldin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Bridge City Family Medical Clinic v. Kent & Johnson, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Fields v. Emergency Services Consulting International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API