Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sleight v. Swanson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1901Published

Error to Gogebic; Haire, J. Assumpsit by Richard Sleight and others against Samuel Swanson on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Campbell,

in his dissenting opinion, said:

“It is only when a defendant is not a resident of the State that he may be served where he can be found. This is a rule of necessity, and results from the doctrine that all persons temporarily in any county become subject to its jurisdiction, and, if they have no fixed residence, must be treated as commorant wherever they are found.”

Defendant relies upon sections 707, 708, 1 Comp. Laws, which read as follows:

“ (707) Every action commenced in such court shall be *441brought before some justice of the peace of the city or township where:
“'First,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wall v. TrumbullMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Spear v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
  4. King v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Shadbolt v. BronsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1848

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API