Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1991No. 6-90-064-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Dan Boyles, Jr. appeals from a judgment rendered against him and Karl Broesche, Ray Widner, and John Paul Tamborello1 for $1,000,000 in favor of Susan Leigh Kerr. The jury awarded Kerr $250,000 for mental pain and anguish caused by the defendants’ tortious acts, $250,000 for future mental pain and anguish, and $500,000 in punitive damages, which was divided among the defendants.

On appeal, Boyles brings four points of error and argues them jointly in his brief. He contends that the trial court erred in rendering judgment because the cause of action upon which the case was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Billings v. AtkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. St. Elizabeth Hospital v. GarrardTexas Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cain v. Hearst Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wheeler v. Yettie Kersting Memorial Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Dallas Morning News v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mitre v. Brooks Fashion Stores, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API