Legal Opinion

Sarfaty v. Recine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

“[T]he award of reasonable counsel fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court” (Matter of Grald v Grald, 33 AD3d 922, 923 [2006]). Under the facts of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding the mother a money judgment for an award of an attorney’s fee in the sum of $16,770 (see Family Ct Act § 438 [a], [b]; Matter of Israel v Israel, 273 AD2d 385 [2000]). Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Fisher and Eng, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grald v. GraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Israel v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dinhofer v. ZabezhanskayaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Westergaard v. WestergaardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Felix v. FelixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Burris v. BurrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Wade v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API