Legal Opinion

Grald v. Grald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 24, 2006PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated October 28, 2005, which directed him to pay the sum of $3,000 for the wife’s attorney’s fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

An “attorney is precluded from seeking fees from his or her client where the attorney has failed to comply with 22 NYCRR 1400.3, which requires the execution and filing of a retainer agreement that sets forth, inter alia, the terms of compensation and the nature of services to be rendered” (Bishop…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Julien v. MachsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Mulcahy v. MulcahyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Behrins & Behrins, P.C. v. SammarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Wagman v. WagmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Olesh v. AuerbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brantly v. BrantlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Hovanec v. HovanecAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Westergaard v. WestergaardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Sarfaty v. RecineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Felix v. FelixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API