Legal Opinion

Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co. v. Sparks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1928No. 519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.

Appellee, Sparks, brought suit against appellant, Wichita Falls, Ranger & Fort Worth Railway Coupany, to recover penalties and damages under the provisions of R. S. 1925, art. 6401, authorizing such recovery in favor of the owner of contiguous lands against a railroad or railway company or corporation for permitting Johnson grass to mature or go to seed upon its right of way. Penalties were claimed amounting to $25 a year for each of the years 1925 (subsequent to June 25, 1925), 1926, and 1927, and also damages to the land in the sum of $5,000. A jury in response to special issues found that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kirby Lumber Company v. ConnTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Vance v. Southern Kansas Ry. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Childers v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Childers v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API