State v. Rice
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
I
Appellant’s first proposition of law is that carrying a concealed weapon and possession of a weapon while under disability are allied offenses of similar import, under R. C. 2941.25 (A), and a person may not be convicted of both offenses based upon a single act of possession. This statute relied upon by the appellant, known as the similar-acts statute, states:
“Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one.”
Ho…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. KoleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FlorsOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. FinnellOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. LyonsOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.