Legal Opinion

State v. Flors

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1987No. 52056 and 52057PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, C.J.

The defendant appeals from his jury trial convictions for bribery, falsification, and tampering with public records. His seven assigned errors challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, the court’s sentence, the conduct of the court, the prosecutor, and his own counsel.

The evidence did not support his convictions for falsifying and tampering with public records, so we dis: charge him for those offenses. We also agree that parts of the sentences were inappropriate or require reconsideration. His remaining contentions lack merit. Therefore, we affirm the bribery conviction but remand it for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. HuntOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. BurgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. DownieOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. FincherOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API