Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Continental Bank & Trust Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1978No. 1242PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting a petition to open a default judgment.

Almost 18 months passed between the filing of the complaint and the taking of the default judgment. The lower court opened the default reasoning that appellant’s failure to give notice of the entry of the default constituted a “snap” judgment.

As far as we can determine, the factual picture (taken from the depositions of the two attorneys involved), was as follows:

After the complaint had been filed, appellee’s attorney contacted appellant’s attorney and requested more time to file a responsive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Fox v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Kramer v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shainline v. Alberti Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. American Vending Co., Inc. v. BrewingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commercial Banking Corp. v. Miller (In Re Miller)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Tronzo v. Equitable Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Nardulli v. John Carlo, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API