Legal Opinion
Pelletier v. Paradis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 23, 1966No. File No. CV 17-641-2238PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.
In his assignment of errors, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in opening the judgment on default and in denying his motion to set aside the jury verdict. Error is not assigned or claimed in the course of the trial to the jury but is directed solely to the granting of the motion to open the judgment. The granting of a motion to *397open a judgment is an interlocutory ruling reviewable upon appeal from the final judgment. Ostroski v. Ostroski, 135 Conn. 509, 511.
In the instant case, we have nothing before us but the record to review the action of the court.
The power of a court to open a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Jacobson v. RobingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Ostroski v. OstroskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Barton v. BartonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Carrington v. MuhlfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Postemski v. LandonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Disturco v. Gates in New Canaan, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Mercedes-Benz Financial v. 1188 Stratford Avenue, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- Mercedes-Benz Financial v. 1188 Stratford Avenue, LLC (Dissent)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- New England Savings Bank v. Clark, No. 511625 (Mar. 15, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.