Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Meeks v. Thompson Tractor Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 31, 1996No. 2941162Published

1Concurrence

The majority's opinion concludes "that although [the worker] deviated slightly from his customary route when he stopped at the Amoco store, his deviation was not substantial." Because I think the worker's "beer stop" was a substantial deviation from his employment, I concur in the result only.

As stated in the majority opinion, it is undisputed that the worker violated the company's alcohol policy and DOT regulations. In Havelin v. Poole Truck Lines, Inc.,395 So.2d 75 (Ala.Civ.App. 1980), cert. den., 395 So.2d 77 (Ala. 1981), this court held that the worker was not entitled to recover…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Union Camp Corporation v. BlackmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. WIREGRASS COMP. MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC INC. v. PriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Havelin v. Poole Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API