Herrin v. State

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Appellant appeals from his convictions of the crimes of assault with a dangerous weapon and assault and battery. 1 We affirm the judgment and commitment which was entered by the superior court.

In his first specification of error, appellant asserts that the trial court erred in not granting his motions for judgment of acquittal.

It is well established that:

When presented with a specification of error of this nature, this court will consider ‘only those facts in the record most favorable to the state and such reasonable inferences as the jury may have drawn from them *…