Legal Opinion

Rockland & Rockport Lime Corp. v. Ham

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 21, 1930No. 148PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, District Judge.

This case was heard by me without a jury, a stipulation having been filed by which the essential facts were presented by agreement and a jury waived.

The suit is brought to recover taxes alleged to have been erroneously and illegally collected by the defendant, a collector of internal revenue. On March 7,1924, the plaintiff, as successor to the Rockland & Rockport Lime Company, paid to the defendant after demand $130,456.53, of which $115,414.44 was for excess profits taxes, and $15,042.09 income taxes, for the year 1917. These amounts were paid by the plaintiff by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Updike v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Clement Gunn v. The United States of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Beam v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  5. Oak Worsted Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  2. United States v. Southern Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. McDonnell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. United States v. TillinghastDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1932
  5. Wright & Taylor, Inc. v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API