Milton L. Osterneck v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And William Lampe
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
The question on appeal is whether a claim may be maintained for violation of the Pennsylvania Securities Act notwithstanding an agreement to submit such claims to arbitration. The district court refused to submit to arbitration a claim of violation of the Pennsylvania Securities Act because it construed a provision of that Act as forbidding judicial enforcement of prior agreements to arbitrate such claims. We conclude that recent Supreme Court precedent applying the Federal Arbitration Act requires a different result.
I
Background
Plaintiff Milton…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Dorothy Zosky v. Daniel Boyer and Boenning and ScattergoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Jeske v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.