Legal Opinion

Milton L. Osterneck v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And William Lampe

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 9, 1988No. 87-1406PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

The question on appeal is whether a claim may be maintained for violation of the Pennsylvania Securities Act notwithstanding an agreement to submit such claims to arbitration. The district court refused to submit to arbitration a claim of violation of the Pennsylvania Securities Act because it construed a provision of that Act as forbidding judicial enforcement of prior agreements to arbitrate such claims. We conclude that recent Supreme Court precedent applying the Federal Arbitration Act requires a different result.

I

Background

Plaintiff Milton…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
  3. Dorothy Zosky v. Daniel Boyer and Boenning and ScattergoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Jeske v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API