Apex Energy Solutions of Seattle LLC v. Foit
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 APEX ENERGY SOLUTIONS OF Case No. C24-672-RSM 7 SEATTLE, LLC, ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 8 Judgment Debtor, JUDGMENT 9 v. CHRISTPOHER L. HUBBARD, 10 Judgment Creditor and 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 MICHAEL FOIT and PAUL LEWIS, Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment. 17 Dkts. #34 and #38. Neither party has requested oral argument, and the Court finds that it can 18 rule without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Daryl Crane Pamela Crane v. Conoco, Inc., a Corporation, and Nunnallee-Cantwell, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sullivan v. United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.