Badgett v. Departments of Industrial Relations
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
As stated in the several opinions of the members of our Court of Appeals, the question here involved is whether this appellant is disqualified for benefits under Code of 1940, Title 26, Article 4, beginning with section 205, on account of the provisions of section 214 subd. A thereof. And more specifically it is whether appellant’s unemployment was directly due to a labor dispute still in active progress.
The alleged dispute grew out of what we understand is called a jurisdictional controversy between a C. I. O. affiliate and an A. F. of L. affiliate in defendant’s plant.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. WohlSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- American Furniture Co. v. I. B.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Usher v. Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Tennessee, Coal, Iron R. Co. v. MartinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Department of Industrial Relations v. StoneAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Gerber v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.