Legal Opinion

Pickett v. Brown

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1991No. 06A01-9009-CV-363PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Kenneth and Jane Pickett appeal the granting of Joan and Robert Browns' Ind. Trial Rule 50 motion at the close of the evidence in the Picketts' suit against the Browns to recover damages to the Picketts' property caused by the flow of water and mud from the Brown's property onto the Picketts' property brought about by the construction of the Browns' home. The trial court granted the T.R. 50 motion stating that the common-enemy doctrine precluded the Picketts' recovery. The Picketts raise three issues, none of which constitutes reversible error.

FACTS

The facts in the light most…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Argyelan v. HavilandIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Teitge v. Remy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Rounds v. HoelscherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Gilmer v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Gilmer v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bulldog Battery Corp. v. Pica Investments, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Trowbridge v. TorabiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Thomas R. Crowel v. Marshall County Drainage BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. KovichDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
  5. Long v. IVC Industrial Coatings, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API