Legal Opinion
Booker v. Engle
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 30, 1981No. C-3-80-204PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY DEEMING MEMORANDUM TO BE AMENDMENT TO PETITION; DECISION AND ENTRY DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS, SAVE THAT WHICH RELATES TO THE TRIAL COURT’S JURY INSTRUCTIONS ON WORD “HAVE”; RESPONDENT DIRECTED TO SERVE AMENDED ANSWER WITHIN TWENTY DAY PERIOD
RICE, District Judge.
This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus by a state prisoner, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent has filed an answer under 28 U.S.C. fol. § 2254, Rule 5, and the matter is now before the Court for determination of the need for an evidentia-ry hearing, or other “disposition of the petition as justice shall…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Maneer LeonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Robert Vernon Bruce v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Booker v. EngleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Raymond Franklin Moore, Jr. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996