NORTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE v. Union Carbide Corp.
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, Chief Judge.
The defendant, Union Carbide Corporation, has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, which has been fully briefed by the parties. Additional motions were filed by defendant to exclude a settlement agreement, and to strike an expert report and affidavit. The plaintiff, Northwestern Public Service, filed a motion for leave to file a corrected and substituted statement of material facts and a motion to exclude the NTSB 1 report. During a pretrial conference held on November 4, 2002, the Court: (1) denied defendant’s motion to strike and exclude…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Young v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Lidoderm Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.