Legal Opinion

(PC) Abdullah v. Dacuycuy

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 28, 2023No. 2:19-cv-00804Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HANIF S. ABDULLAH, No. 2:19-cv-0804 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DACUYCUY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Hanif S. Abdullah, a former state prisoner, proceeds through counsel with a civil 19 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is before the 20 court. (ECF No. 52.) This matter was previously taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 21 230(g). For the following reasons, the undersigned recommends the motion be…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API