Legal Opinion

Application of McDonald

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 10, 1922:

Eschweiler, J.

Upon the hearing of this matter the assistant attorney general, appearing on behalf of the warden, very frankly conceded that there was no warrant in law for the continued confinement of said petitioner in the state prison and for that reason no formal return was made or objection interposed to the granting of the petitioner’s prayer for his discharge.

It has been requested, however, and it is deemed advisable, that the situation presented under the record should be discussed.

Apparently the theory upon which the petitioner was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People Ex Rel. Newton v. . TwomblyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. State v. GrottkauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In re PikulikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. In re McCormick for a Habeas CorpusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Redway v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  2. Commonwealth v. Polsgrove, County JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. State v. RohlCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Medlock v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API