Legal Opinion
Boisey C. v. Social Security Administration Commissioner et al.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 20, 2026No. 1:25-cv-04510Unknown
1Opinion
UO. SUNT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC DATE FILED: 7/20/2026 □ BOISEY C., Plaintiff, 25-CV-4510 (KHP) -against- OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AND MOTION TO REMAND COMMISSIONER et al., Defendants. KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action seeking disabled adult child (“DAC”) benefits under § 420(d)(1)(b) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), which were previously denied. See Caldwell v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 19 Civ. 6534,
2020 WL…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maria TEJADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.