Legal Opinion

United States v. Roger Roybal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2013No. 19-70302PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAHAN, District Judge:

Appellant Roger Allen Roybal (“Roy-bal”) pleaded guilty to one count of receiving child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). Based on its holding that Roybal’s act of showing child pornography to an eleven-year-old victim qualified ás “distribution,” the district court (1) applied a six-level sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3)(D), and (2) declined to apply a two-level reduction under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(l). On appeal, Roybal contends that his act of “showing” child pornography does not qualify as “distribution” under the sentencing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Rodney Robert Kimbrew, A.K.A. Carlton CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Matthew Henry WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Daniel R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Albert Hernandez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Albert Hernandez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Armando Mendoza-PeraltaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API