United States v. Armando Mendoza-Peralta
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Armando Mendoza-Peralta appeals the sentence he received following his conviction by guilty plea to one count of receiving images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
1. The district court did not proeedurally err by supposedly inadequately explaining its selection of a sex offender evaluation condition that includes a “physiological testing” requirement. A physiological testing condition that entails penile…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Matthew Henry WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Antonio D. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Collins ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.