Legal Opinion

United States v. Armando Mendoza-Peralta

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2015No. 14-50080Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Armando Mendoza-Peralta appeals the sentence he received following his conviction by guilty plea to one count of receiving images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

1. The district court did not proeedurally err by supposedly inadequately explaining its selection of a sex offender evaluation condition that includes a “physiological testing” requirement. A physiological testing condition that entails penile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. Matthew Henry WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Antonio D. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Collins ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API