Legal Opinion

United States v. Edling

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2018No. 16-10457PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.

*1155ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

The government's motion to amend opinion, filed June 22, 2018, is GRANTED.

The opinion filed on June 8, 2018, is amended as follows:

On page 13 of the slip opinion, delete the paragraph beginning with the sentence < The Nevada courts have not definitively answered this question.> and ending with the phrase < as not requiring the kind of violent physical force necessary to satisfy the Johnson standard.>.

On page 13 of the slip opinion, delete the sentence: < In addition,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Charles R. Jackson v. Tom L. Carey R. Papac, Lt. J. Marshall A. Davis E. Padilla Burton R. Lieberman, DoctorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jeffery Bridges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Desmond CampCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Marlon EasonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Richard GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Deljuan BankstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API