Legal Opinion

Andersen v. Corbitt

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1989No. 88-176PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

We are provided a settlement agreement negotiated between law firms which did not stay settled resulting in a $20,000 inter-pleader suit and the involvement of two more law firms to decide who gets the deposited funds. The extreme hostility between the individual litigants is pervasive. Appeal is taken from a summary judgment disposition and we reverse to award the escrowed funds to appellant, Dr. Brent Andersen (Andersen).

The facts are more complex than the agreement which was made for disposition of the money. All of this arises out of problems at the Southwest Counseling…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wyoming Board of Certified Public Accountants v. ChristensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. OkieWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. OkieWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Roybal v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Roybal v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API