Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. M. A. C.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1974No. 8145PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This case hinges on the jurisdictional question of whether a timely notice of appeal was filed by the government. The juvenile, then aged 14 years and 11 months, was charged with first-degree murder and felony-murder (rape) (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2401), and carnal knowledge (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2801) of a 12-year-old girl. A pretrial motion to suppress the oral and written confessions was granted on Miranda grounds, the government contending that the juvenile was not in custody when interrogated. 1 The government filed a no tice of appeal 11 days thereafter. We dismiss…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re T. T. T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. District of Columbia v. I. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. In re B. L. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Matter of TTTDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Matter of WAFDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API