Legal Opinion
Matter of WAF
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1990No. 88-986PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
573 A.2d 1264 (1990)
In the Matter of W.A.F., Appellant.
No. 88-986.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued February 14, 1990.
Decided April 30, 1990.
Arthur J. Whalen, appointed by this court, for appellant.
Mary L. Wilson, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Herbert O. Reid, Acting Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, FERREN and FARRELL, Associate Judges.
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant, W.A.F., a mildly retarded youth, appeals from an adjudication of delinquency on the ground that his due process…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re CareyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000