Legal Opinion

United States v. Yates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 21, 2007No. Nos. 04-50231, 05-50741Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Paul Yates and William F. McCray appeal their jury convictions and sentences arising out of their actions in connection with companies that purportedly solicited and traded investment funds in foreign currencies.1 Yates was sentenced before the Supreme Court’s decisions in United States v. Booker and United States v. Fanfan, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Yates challenges his sentence because the court found facts at sentencing which increased the guideline range and followed the guidelines as if they were mandatory. In this case, as in United States v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. McCrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API