Legal Opinion

State v. Harden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1979No. 796SC366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant attempts to assign error in the denial of his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s evidence. Following the denial of the motion, he put on evidence in his own behalf. No motion was made at the conclusion of all the evidence. He, therefore, waived his prior motion and cannot now bring it forward as appealable error. G.S. 15-173; State v. Fikes, 270 N.C. 780, 155 S.E. 2d 277 (1967); State v. Rhyne, 39 N.C. App. 319, 250 S.E. 2d 102 (1979). Defendant has not asserted, as he could have without exception at trial, that all the evidence was insufficient as a matter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. SelfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. FikesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API