State v. Fair
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s failure to charge the jury that the doctrine of recent possession was applicable only if the jury found beyond a reasonable doubt that the cuff links discovered in the defendant’s possession were stolen at the same time and place as the items listed in the bill of indictment.
The State relied heavily on the doctrine of recent possession. Upon an indictment for larceny, recent possession of stolen property has always been considered by this Court as a circumstance tending to show the guilt of the possessor. State v. Bell, 270 N.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. LeDucSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. PickardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.