Legal Opinion

FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 8, 2020No. 1:16-cv-12653Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * * * * In re INTUNIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION * Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-12653-ADB (Direct Purchasers) * * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS BURROUGHS, D.J. Direct-Purchaser Plaintiff Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. (“RDC”) filed this antitrust action on behalf of a putative class comprised of entities that purchased the pharmaceutical Intuniv (the brand name for extended release guanfacine hydrochloride) from the drug’s brand manufacturer Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc. (collectively, “Shire”) or from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re: Daniel Fordu, Debtor. Harold A. Corzin v. Julie A. ForduCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Louisiana World Exposition v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. AstraZeneca AB v. United Food & Commercial Workers UnionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. David A. Morlan v. Universal Guaranty Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API