Davis v. Puritan-Bennett Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendant’s Bill Of Costs And Motion To Strike Costs (Doc. # 36) filed February 14, 1996. Plaintiff seeks to strike from defendant’s bill of costs the $895.40 expense óf a deposition videographer and the $40.00 pro hae vice motion filing fee.
FACTS
On August 18, 1965, plaintiff filed a sexual discrimination complaint against defendant Puritan-Bennett Corporation. After plaintiffs original counsel withdrew from the case, plaintiff claimed that she had difficulty finding new counsel and meeting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Furr v. AT & T Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Griffith v. Mt. Carmel Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Meredith v. Schreiner Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Weseloh-Hurtig v. HepkerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tilton v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Craftsmen Limousine, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Eagle Insurance v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- Schmitz-Werke GmbH + Co. v. Rockland Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Aerotech Resources, Inc. v. Dodson Aviation, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.