Holland v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
UTTER, Justice.
This is an appeal f om a judgment entered in a non-jury trial to recover under an indemnity agreement for payments made on several performance bonds. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, appellee-plaintiff, brought this suit against Joe T. Holland, Harold B. Smith and H-S Green Company, Inc., appellants-defendants, for losses on three (3) bonds in the amount of $100,787.62 plus interest and attorneys’ fees. In answer to appellee’s petition ap pellants plead a general denial and the statute of limitations. The trial court entered judgment for appellee. We affirm.
On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Whatley v. WhatleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Russell v. LemonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Pope v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Pate v. Tellepsen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Valero Energy Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Tubb v. Bartlett, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
- First Dallas Petroleum, Inc. v. Hawkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- D. Wilson Construction Co. v. Cris Equipment Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Sparks v. Cameron Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.