Legal Opinion
In re J.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 2021No. CA2021-06-072 CA2021-06-073 CA2021-07-083 CA2021-07-084PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as In re J.M.,
2021-Ohio-3961.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY IN RE: : J.M., et al. : CASE NOS. CA2021-06-072 CA2021-06-073 : CA2021-07-083 CA2021-07-084 : OPINION : 11/8/2021 : APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case Nos. JN2019-0015 & JN2019-0016 Garrett Law Offices, and Dawn S. Garrett, for appellant. Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Willa Concannon, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Amy Ashcraft, guardian ad litem. D.E., father, pro se. HENDRICKSON, J. {¶1} Appellant, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- In re M.B.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re T.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re A.D.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re I.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022