Legal Opinion · Dissent

Riddleberger v. Chesapeake Western Railway

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 8, 1985No. Record 820760Published

1DissentCochran, J.

In my view, the majority opinion, declaring unconstitutional certain provisions of Code § 55-154, represents an unjustified abandonment of the doctrine of stare decisis to which we have often expressed our devotion. The effect may be to replace order with confusion, certainty with doubt, assurance with insecurity. A brief review of the history of the statute reveals a sound underlying legislative intent.

*223The first law establishing a prima facie presumption of nonexistence of “minerals, coals, oils, or ores” was enacted in 1924. Acts 1924, c. 472. The Act applied only to “non-mountainous” land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin's Executors v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Ex parte SettleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  3. City of Portsmouth v. WeissSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Love v. Lynchburg Natioanal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  5. Myers v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API