Legal Opinion
Albert v. Spiegelberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWasservogel, J.
Petitioner moves for an order to compel respondents to proceed with the arbitration of a controversy which has arisen between the parties and to accept as an arbitrator one Weller, an attorney at law and an office associate of petitioner. By agreement between the parties it is provided: “ Any controversy arising between us shall be determined by arbitration pursuant to the Arbitration Law of the State of New York, and under the rules of either the Arbitration Committee of the Chamber of Commerce of the State of New York, or of the Arbitration Society of America, or of the Arbitration…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wheeling Gas Co. v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1872
- Sholz v. MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Textile Corp. & Sheila-Lynn, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Empire Plexiglass Corp. v. Levitt CorpCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948
- In re the Arbitration between Film Classics, Inc. & Hal Roach Studios, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1945
- In re the Arbitration between Triangle Linen Service, Inc. & M. & M. Candy LunchNew York Supreme Court · 1948